Hold Your Nose and Vote

It’s not exactly an inspiring election day. There six measures on the ballot, and not one of them deserves to be there. They are ugly comprimises dreamed up by a dysfunctional legislature.

So, Californians, probably very few of us, trudged to the voting booth, and not very enthusiastically.

I voted yes on all ballot measures. Why? Not because the legislation proposed represented competent lawmaking, but because they were the best on offer for a bad situation.

I have no doubt that the measures will go down in flames. They were written by an unpopular legislature and supported by an unpopular governor. 

Furthermore, the few who cast their ballots today were probably predominately out-of-sorts voters fed up with bailouts and recession, not willing to spend a dime. You know, the tea party types.

California voters are a fickle lot: we want all our services, but don’t want to pay for them. Republicans block raising taxes, but are unwilling to make unpopular cuts.

So I voted today in what must have been the most uninspiring election day of a lifetime. Quite a downer compared with November.

And what will tomorrow bring? A huge deficit, and more bad budgetary news.

We Californians must fix our budget, and we should start with reform of the state’s government. We should remove the gerrymandering that elects extremists from both parties. We should remove the absurd two-thirds requirement to pass budgets and the requirement for a two-thirds vote to raise taxes.

The time for reform is now, while the dust is settling. Maybe we won’t have to hold our noses for the next election.

This Week in Conejo Valley Politics, April 5, 2009

They have common ground after all. Congresspersons Lois Capps and Elton Gallegly each received an award by the Humane Society for writing legislation that protects animals. Protection of human life was obvious excepted, as Gallegly has been a strong supporter of continuing the Iraq war.

The Do It Center was victorious in its campaign to squelch legitimate competition. On Wednesday, supporters of the failed Measure B  successfully lobbied the Thousand Oaks City Council to forbid Home Depot from building a store in the city. Free enterprise be damned.

During his state senate campaign last year, Tony Strickland weakly claimed to be an alternative energy executive, although he admits in papers filed last month that his income from his putative company, Green Wave Energy Solutions, was between $0 and  $499 last year. Could it be that Green Wave was just an expedient way to ride the clean energy wave without doing anything substantive?

Justice takes a holiday. The man who killed a jogger in Thousand Oaks last summer was sentenced to only six years in prison and financial restitution. Six years? That’s four less than the maximum, which itself is insufficient.

Plastic bags are bad for the environment, so the city of Moorpark wants to ban them. It will not because it fears being sued. The cost, too, is high. Then there’s the plastics industry. The environment usually loses out to industry.

California beware: climate change is real in the state and it is worse than expected. Higher temperatures, loss of agriculture revenue, greater electricity use, and worse, says the state’s Climate Action Team. Let’s hope Republicans take the team’s report to heart.

Governor Schwarzenegger appointed an independent auditor to oversee the $50 billion  California will likely receive from President Obama’s stimulus package.  Well done, both of you.

A man in New York walks into a building with two guns and a lot of ammunition. He kills 13 people there before killing himself. Sound familiar? It should. It’s the fifth such massacre this month. And yet the NRA opposes restrictions on gun ownership. Enough already.

Republican religious extremists were further marginalized this week by an Iowa Supreme Court decision that struck down as unconstitutional a law banning gay marriage. As Iowa goes, so goes the nation.

Why You Should Oppose the Ronald Reagan Centennial Commission Act

During this time of crisis, when our country is faced with an economic meltdown, when unemployment   nearly 10% in Ventura County, and when the nation is struggling to end two wars, fight global warming, and defuse an incendiary Middle East, our representative in Congress, Elton Gallegly, suggests we take a time out and honor Ronald Reagan.

That’s right, Gallegly and his Republican cronies want to celebrate the hundredth anniversary of Reagan’s birth next year using federal resources and under federal auspices. This is the kind of thing normally reserved for someone like, say, Abraham Lincoln, whose bicentennial we celebrated on February 12 of this year.

Now Lincoln, one of the first Republicans, accomplished a lot of things during his presidency: he crushed a rebellion that nearly destroyed the nation, he signed an Emancipation Proclamation that freed slaves held in rebel territory, and, despite his suspension of habeas corpus—permitted during time of insurrection—he honorably upheld the Constitution during a time of civil war.

Reagan, in contrast, violated the Constitution with an impunity that foreshadowed George W. Bush’s  presidency. Remember the Iran-Contra affair? Students of history may recall that American hostages being held in Lebanon were freed in exchange for weapons—highly effective missiles, as it turns out. That’s right, Reagan brokered a deal whereby he sold Iran weapons in exchange for the release of the hostages. A dirty business that also happened to contravene American law.

Some of the money from the proceeds of the sale of the missiles went to fund the Nicaraguan Contras. Congress had explicitly prohibited any part of government from supporting the Contras, but this was subverted by the Reagan administration.

The American legislative branch of government and the people were in the dark about this until a Lebanese newspaper blew the story wide open, prompting Reagan to deny the charges. A week later he backtracked, admitting they were true, but stating that he didn’t know about them at the time.

The National Security Archive website describes the reaction of the American people: “Of all the revelations that emerged, the most galling for the American public was the president’s abandonment of the longstanding policy against dealing with terrorists, which Reagan repeatedly denied doing in spite of overwhelming evidence that made it appear he was simply lying to cover up the story.”

It was bad enough that a president would arm terrorists after having sworn in public never to even talk to them, but what he did with the money subverted the very Constitution he swore to protect and defend.

Reagan was lucky not to have been impeached. Many cabinet officials were charged with crimes. They all lied to protect Reagan, because impeachment was unthinkable to them. Reagan’s successor, George H.W. Bush, also a co-consipirator, later pardoned the cabinet officials at the end of his term.

By and large the American people forgave Reagan, but Iran-Contra remained forever a black spot on his record. Bill Clinton’s peccadilloes are trifling in comparison.

Gallegly and his Republican colleagues long ago decided that Reagan was a saint. They have engaged in a systematic campaign to canonize him, naming all manner of public edifices after him, including what was formerly known as Washington National Airport, now renamed after the Gipper.

If the Republicans had their way, they would probably replace Lincoln’s chiseled face on Mount Rushmore with the aw-shucks grin our most famous actor-politician. After all, Republicans have thoroughly abandoned Lincoln’s legacy. They now see war as the first option, not the last; they no longer claim to need Constitutional authority to suspend habeas corpus; they are no longer concerned with the rights of minorities.

This partisan Republican campaign to elevate Reagan is clearly wrong. It seeks to turn a partisan hero into a nonpartisan emblem of America. We must oppose it vigorously.

On March 9, the dubious legislation Gallegly sponsored, HR131, passed the House. It was supported overwhelmingly by  Republicans. Democrats, I am ashamed to say, voiced little opposition. Reagan remains widely popular. Reagan’s legacy is now viewed by many people through the opaque lens of nostalgia. Many credit him with bringing down the Berlin wall and winning the Cold War. He does deserve a lot of credit for this.

Reagan was a good man, but not a great man. He did, after all, make many of us feel good about ourselves after the malaise of the 1970s. He was charming. But he was a strong partisan, and his presidency ushered in an era of intolerant conservatism. Here is a short list of the sins of the Reagan administration, which demonstrates that we should not, in fact, portray him as a hero or allow our children to be brainwashed by Republican propaganda about him:

• He lied to the American people about his knowledge of Iran-Contra.
• He displayed a willingness to subvert the Constitution.
• He ignored the AIDS crisis that was ravaging America.
• He cut social programs to make way for a massive military buildup.
• His budget cuts hurt the poor; his tax cuts favored the rich.
• He began the foolish process of excessively deregulating businesses, which was the root cause  our current economic woes.
• He oversaw a crumbling of the separation between church and state that prepared the way for the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives.
• He promulgated the odious doctrine that government is the enemy—that it should be reduced at all costs—even at the cost of financial meltdown, as we now know.

HR131 is now in the Senate. Please write your senators to ask them to kill this bill before it sees the light of day. Write to Gallegly to voice your displeasure for his sponsorship of this bill.

If the Ronald Reagan Centennial Commission Act is passed into law, your children will be subjected to Republican propaganda as they are forced to learn a too-rosy version of Reagan’s story in their schools. They will certainly not learn about the Iran-Contra affair. They will instead learn that government is the problem, not the solution; that prosperity must begin at the top and might trickle down, eventually.

Do not stand for this, America. Stop the  Ronald Reagan Centennial Commission Act dead in its tracks.

We can respect Reagan for the good things he accomplished, for the dignity of his office, and for his valiant and ultimately successful fight against communism, but we should never allow Republicans to paint Reagan as an American saint. Someone so willing to trample our Constitution can never be called a hero

Climate Change and the Conejo Valley

I recently finished Tim Flannery’s The Weather Makers: How Man Is Changing the Climate and What It Means for Life on Earth . I wasn’t terribly compelled by its yawn-inducing cover—a flaming ice cube—but my timing in taking on the book couldn’t have been better, and the book itself was superb.

As far as the timing goes, Al Gore had just won a well-deserved Nobel Prize for his work on spreading awareness of climate change. His particular contribution, as everyone now knows, was the documentary An Inconvenient Truth.

It has been about a year since the British government released the Stern Review Report on the Economics of Climate Change, which showed the world that fighting global warming would actually save money—and lives—in the long run.

Flannery, an Australian scientist, reviewed data and studies on climate change to produce the book. His conclusion: we must act soon if we are to avoid catastrophic global warming by the middle of this century.

The book is a compelling read written for the layperson. You do not need any particular knowledge of science to understand the issues.

Flannery helpfully debunks global warming myths, including many of those propagated by our own state senator responsible for the Conejo Valley, Tom McClintock.

This is good reading for anyone looking to combat Republican attacks against global warming science. Most of the these attacks are based on long-discredited arguments, pseudoscience, and studies commissioned by energy companies. As such, Flannery’s well-supported arguments should cause serious readers to think twice about swallowing the GOP’s assertions.

The Republican line, that climate change is a hoax dreamed up by liberals and scientists looking to keep grant money flowing, has led President Bush to strongarm scientists and public servants into watering down their own reports of the effects of climate change.

The Bush administration’s sins against the environment are well documented. Let’s take a look at some of the headlines over the course of his tenure as president.

It all started when Bush refused to ratify the Kyoto Protocol: see “Global Warming: U.S. Turns Its Back on Kyoto,” published by CNN in 2001. Bush’s intransigence was a giant step backward. Both the United States and Australia refused to ratify the treaty, which would have required modest cuts in carbon emissions.

The Bush administration argued that these cuts would harm the U.S. economy, an allegation conclusively put to rest by the United Kingdom’s 2006 Stern Review Report on the Economics of Climate Change.

In 2001, “Scientists Warn Bush on Global Warming” appeared on the BBC News website. After the National Academy of Sciences report mentioned in the article was released, the Bush administration had to tone down its very loud, public doubts about climate change.

It did not stop them altogether.

“Bush Disses Global Warming Report: Dismisses His Own Environmental Protection Agency’s Findings,” appeared on www.cbsnews.com on June 4, 2002. The EPA report, said Philip Clapp, president of the National Environmental Trust, “undercuts everything the president has said about global warming since he took office.”

Even the Pentagon spoke truth to power: “Now the Pentagon Tells Bush: Climate Change Will Destroy Us” appeared in the Guardian in February 2004.

The Pentagon report, leaked to the press, predicted war and the possibility of a dangerous escalation using nuclear weapons as nations try to defend dwindling food supplies in the face of traumatic climate change.

“The findings will prove humiliating to the Bush administration, which has repeatedly denied that climate change even exists,” wrote authors Mark Townsend and Paul Harris.

The president, still apparently disbelieving in the veracity of scientists’ claims about the human causes of global climate change, tried to stifle the constant stream of science unfavorable to his opinions.

In “NASA Scientist Rips Bush on Global Warming,” released by the Associated Press and published on MSNBC.com on October 27, 2004, NASA scientist James Hansen, director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, said, “In my more than three decades in government, I have never seen anything approaching the degree to which information flow from scientists to the public has been screened and controlled as it is now.”

What else should Americans expect from a Texas oilman?

The Republican Party Platform of the ill-fated 2004 election trotted out its same old arguments about climate change, but at least acknowledged the problem:

“Republicans are committed to meeting the challenge of long-term global climate change by relying on markets and new technologies to improve energy efficiency. These efforts will help reduce emissions over time while allowing the economy to grow. Our President and our Party strongly oppose the Kyoto Protocol and similar mandatory carbon emissions controls that harm economic growth and destroy American jobs.”

This carefully crafted paragraph is the epitome of Republican prevarication. It seeks to recognize the problem, but scuttle any chances of resolving it.

The problem with this logic, as Flannery points out in his book, is that Bush offers no alternative to Kyoto that will address the urgency of the climate change problem.

It is instructive that the GOP’s website, in its issues page, does not even list global warming or climate change, but does devote a panel to “Faith & Values.”

All of this evidence makes it clear that the president and his party are pursuing the wrong set of values: In its meek offering to public opinion, the GOP touts the president’s advocacy of “coal, nuclear, natural gas, and renewable sources” of energy. Note the first on this list—the biggest polluter of all, and an industry that is a big supporter of the GOP.

Conejo Valley residents are an educated bunch. A good number of us are employed by Amgen or Baxter, biotech firms, or Countrywide, a mortgage broker. Intelligent people staff each company and have driven their success, which persists despite recent setbacks.

These people, despite living in an area called Reagan country—due to the influence of the former president and his library in nearby Simi Valley—are savvy about climate change and will discriminate between the good arguments offered by scientists and bad arguments offered by a few feckless politicians.

Among the latter are Tom McClintock and Tony Strickland. McClintock is our current Republican state senator for District 19 and Strickland is vying for his seat with the eventual Democratic nominee, be it Hannah-Beth Jackson or Jim Dantona.

There is little the average voter with limited time can find out about Strickland’s views on climate change. Except, of course, his voting record as a state assemblyman.

As Jackson points out on her website, Strickland and McClintock “have consistently opposed sensible measures to protect our air, water and wild places.”

Strickland and McClintock “both opposed important measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles (AB 1493, 2002), to recycle toxic electronic wastes (SB 20, 2003), and to increase California’s supply or clean, renewable energy (SB 1078, 2002).”

Given this record, and given the urgency of the problem of climate change, we cannot afford to elect Strickland or anyone like him.

Things have changed in the past few years—the problem has become more urgent and voters are more educated about climate change thanks to Al Gore and others.

Conejo Valley residents will no longer elect climate change deniers.

Jim Dantona on the Issues: Part 1—The Campaign

This article is the first in a series about Jim Dantona’s views on the issues that are important to him and to residents of California’s State Senate District 19, which he seeks to represent. The district is currently represented by Tom McClintock, who will step down at the expiration of his term. Former state assemblyman Tony Strickland looks likely to win the Republican nomination; Dantona and former state assemblywoman Hannah-Beth Jackson will contest the Democratic nomination.

When Jim Dantona announced he would enter the campaign for the California State Senate’s District 19 seat in August, the race was still wide open. Only former Republican assemblyman Tony Strickland was known to be running for the seat.

But then, after weeks of swirling rumors, former assemblywoman Hannah-Beth Jackson announced on October 17 that she would enter the race.

After years of declining Republican voter registration in Ventura County, the race is competitive and according to Timm Herdt of the Ventura County Star, will be closely watched by both parties.

“It will likely be one of the most contested and expensive Senate races in the state, as it is one of only a few that is potentially competitive,” Herdt wrote on August 28.

Now this is getting exciting.

“Dantona’s candidacy has energized east county Democrats who have endured years of famine,” wrote Herdt in an October 24 opinion piece, “A Democratic Civil War?”

The problem for Dantona is that Jackson enjoys the support of many people in Santa Barbara and the west end of the county.

This could mean an east-west battle over the Democratic nomination.

Make no mistake, District 19 is an important part of a very important state. It includes the Ventura County cities of Ventura, Thousand Oaks, Camarillo, Moorpark, Ojai, and Simi Valley among others. In Santa Barbara County, it includes the cities of Santa Barbara, Goleta, Montecito, and Lompoc, among others.

Even after the Democratic nominee is chosen, there will be a tough battle against Tony Strickland, who has already raised a lot of money.

So why is Jim Dantona running?

“This race means a great deal to me,” he said at a fundraiser on October 18. “We are motivated.”

“We can finally break the hold of the McClintock-Strickland machine that they’ve had for so many years.”

Dantona’s strategy has been to call himself a centrist, knowing that the district is narrowly split between Democrats and Republicans, with a large cadre of people declining to state a party affiliation.

“You know, it’s not a matter of just some label on you—you’re liberal, you’re conservative, you’re a Democrat, you’re a Republican—it doesn’t really matter: it’s about all of us living a better life,” said Dantona.

During the speech at his fundraiser, Dantona mentioned jobs, health care, and education as his primary concerns. These are the same issues he discussed in a September 13 article in the VC Reporter.

He added women’s reproductive rights to the list during an interview with me the night of his fundraiser.

“I care about the ability of women to be able to choose what they want, that they’re working on the same level,” he said.

The issues of jobs and health care are interrelated for Dantona.

“I am not against globalization,” he said. “What I’m against is when major corporations end up outsourcing jobs, Americans, Californians in particular, lose their jobs, they can’t afford any health care, they can’t afford anything else in terms of putting food on the table.”

Dantona objects to corporations receiving “tax benefits,” as he calls them, despite outsourcing jobs overseas.

Education is another key issue for Dantona, who believes that No Child Left Behind “doesn’t solve one problem in this state.” And, he says, “we need to get rid of it now.”

Getting back to the campaign itself, Dantona was gracious about his Democratic opponent—but makes it clear that he’s out to win: “I have no problem with Hannah-Beth, she’s a wonderful person. This district isn’t drawn for her. She’s way too far to the left and I’m a centrist and I’m the guy who can bring it all together. I have the leadership’s support on this thing and with that, that’s going to be the thing that wins the race, and that’s what I believe is going to happen.”

McClintock Attacks Gore, Conservationists; Disputes Global Warming Science

In an October 12 speech to the Western Conservative Political Action Conference, California State Senator Tom McClintock mounted a persuasive, and yet poorly informed attack against Al Gore, conservation, and the most widely accepted scientific theory of global warming.

 

This is fortunate: McClintock’s comments have assured his well-deserved fate of political irrelevance and ignominy.

 

McClintock repeated well-worn Republican jokes about personal jets and Gore’s electricity bill. He mentioned several laughably out-of-date theories about the causes of recent climate change. He even proudly admits that his knowledge about climate change has its most profound roots in his grade school musings.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If Tony Strickland, the Republican running for McClintock’s hotly contested District 19 seat, adopts these backward views, any Democrat running for the seat will receive a boost in popularity.

 

The entire text of McClintock’s speech was posted on his blog, Citizens for the California Republic.

 

What is discouraging is that so many loyal Republicans–petulant at the world’s recognition of Gore’s contribution to the fight against man-made climate change–are susceptible to the the alluring but factually erroneous arguments advanced by McClintock.

 

Contrary to what he asserts, McClintock’s arguments are advanced by only a slim minority of scientists, but they are enormously popular among Republicans.

 

This position is damaging to the Republican party and will cause it to lose votes in California and nationally.

 

Democrats, if we can brand ourselves as the party of responsible environmentalism, stand to gain enormously from such Republican foolishness.

 

I urge all Conejo Valley residents concerned about global warming to attend the Democratic Club of the Conejo Valley‘s meeting at 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, November 14, at the Goebel Senior Center in Thousand Oaks.

 

Speakers will include Perrin Pellegrin, Sustainability Manager at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and Gayle Kaufman of the City of Thousand Oaks.

 

The night’s topic will be sustainability and how to be environmentally responsible.

 

The Goebel Senior Center is located at 1385 E. Janss Road. Click here for a map.

 

All those interested in countering McClintock’s failures of logic should do two things: (1) educate yourself about the facts of climate change and (2) post rebuttals to McClintock’s blog by visiting his post here.

 

Below appears my hastily dashed-off response to McClintock, which I posted on Saturday night:

 

Senator McClintock’s attack of Al Gore is crude and impolite.

His attack of global warming, although beguilingly laced with half-baked science, is incorrect. I quote the “Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change,” published one year ago by Sir Nicholas Stern, Head of the Government Economic Service for the United Kingdom: “The scientific evidence is now overwhelming: climate change is a serious global threat, and it demands an urgent global response.”

Furthermore, McClintock’s argument that limited man-made global warming is overly burdensome on the economy can be discarded, as Stern indicates:

“The world does not need to choose between averting climate change and promoting growth and development. Changes in energy technologies and in the structure of economies have created opportunities to decouple growth from greenhouse gas emissions. Indeed, ignoring climate change will eventually damage economic growth.”

Shame on you, Senator McClintock, for your seemingly sagacious dissembling. I hope you will change your opinion on global warming and the feasibility of fighting it.

Elected officials should be advocating the best science, not placing obstacles in the way of the best science.

Environment Topic of Next Meeting of the Democratic Club of the Conejo Valley

Voters in upcoming elections have a clear and easy choice: vote for Republicans, who in general deny that climate change is real, caused by human activity, and who will do nothing to address the issue, or vote for Democrats, who in general recognize that climate change is real, caused by human activity, and will draft legislation to mitigate its effects.

 

 

Former Vice President Al Gore wins a Nobel Prize for his work in publicizing the effects of climate change; current President George W. Bush suppresses testimony of executive branch officials about the severe effects of climate change.

 

 

It’s time we register our disapproval of the climate change deniers with our votes.

 

 

The Democratic Club of the Conejo Valley will devote its next meeting on Wednesday, November 14, to discussing ideas and “tangible actions we can take to reduce global warming in our community and our homes,” according to its newsletter.

 

 

The meeting will be held at 6:30 p.m. at the Goebel Senior Center at 1385 E. Janss Road in Thousand Oaks. For more information, see www.conejodemocrats.com or call 805-675-8785.

 

Jim Dantona Knocks It Out of the Park

Sure, you knew that Jim Dantona is running for California’s District 19 Senate seat. You might know that he was once a professional baseball player. But did you know that he can fire up a crowd and raise a big pile of money and at the same time?

 

 

Yep. And then some.

 

 

 

At a fundraiser Thursday night in Simi Valley, former Maryland Lt. Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend gave a moving tribute to Dantona, whom she has known for years.

 

 

The two are such close friends that Dantona even helped her find a used car for her daughter years ago. And the car still works, she said.

 

Dantona’s son, he said, is named after Robert Kennedy, Townsend’s father.

 

 

Los Angeles City Councilman Tony Cardenas spoke highly of Dantona.

 

“I have had the pleasure of meeting Jim Dantona is somewhat of an awkward way,” he said. “There was a heavyweight-middleweight fight in the San Fernando Valley in 1996 and Jim and I ran for the state assembly.”

 

“The problem was we were running for the same seat….I got to know Jim during that race and believe it or not, on election night, we realized that we were friends. I was blessed to be the elected assemblyman that night and Jim called me and he said, ‘Tony, if there’s anything you need, you let me know.’”

 

“I’ve run in various races and I’ve received those phone calls many many times, but this is the only person who actually meant it and has lived it. That’s the character and integrity of Jim Dantona.”

 

Dantona, it seems, is both a loyal friend and a fighter.

 

 

 

And he’s out to win.

 

Dantona faces two hurdles in his bid to win a seat on the California Senate: Hannah-Beth Jackson and Tony Strickland.

 

Jackson announced her candidacy for office Wednesday in Santa Barbara. Tony Strickland is the lone Republican candidate for the office, and is said to have raised about $400,000.

 

Tom McClintock, the current conservative Republican officeholder, might even get to run for the seat again if an ill-conceived ballot measure passes in February.

 

But despite these obstacles, Dantona is squared up to the plate and ready to swing. And now he has the strength of a little money in his campaign coffers.

 

“The major difference between myself and Tony [Strickland], McClintock, and any of the Republicans is that I can work with both sides now,” said Dantona. “I can work with the pro tem and the leadership of the party, and that’s what we need.”

 

“You elect Strickland or anybody else including McClintock and they could never work with the leadership.”

 

“This district was unrepresented for 8 years under McClintock. It will be unrepresented if another Republican takes over.”

 

Go get ‘em Jim. We need you out there hitting for us.

 

 

 

And Now for Something Completely Different: Jackson versus Dantona

The Ventura County Star reported Tuesday that Hannah-Beth Jackson was set to announce her candidacy Wednesday for California’s District 19 Senate seat.

 

A Jackson announcement, said to be scheduled for Mound Elementary in Ventura, would mean that Jim Dantona, who declared his candidacy months ago, would have company in his quest for the Democratic nomination.

 

The winner of the primary will be pitted against Republican Tony Strickland, the only candidate so far for his party’s nomination.

 

News of Jackson’s impending announcement kicked off a fierce debate on Brian Dennert’s blog, which has a good readership of both parties.

 

The question of whether Jackson’s announcement would make Democrats weaker in the district was widely discussed.

 

“Democrats aren’t afraid of a little competition,” wrote Laura Winchester. “I’m looking forward to a spirited competition.”

 

Heather Schmidt, who recently stepped down as president of the Young Progressive Democrats of Ventura County, wrote, “I look forward to a fair primary and hope that at the end the Dems can unite to take down the Strickland-machine.”

 

Republicans, predictably, were less generous. Most hoped that Jackson’s entering the race would divide the Democratic vote.

 

News of Jackson’s announcement came just before Dantona’s big fundraiser on Thursday. Donors will be able to rub shoulders with former Maryland Lt. Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend and California Senate President Pro Tempore Don Perata.

 

This lucky blogger was among those invited to come and report on the event. Check back here Friday for the scoop.

 

 

Hannah-Beth Jackson to Announce Candidacy Wednesday in State Senate Race

Blogger Brian Dennert reports that former state assemblywoman Hannah-Beth Jackson plans to announce her candidacy tomorrow for the California State Senate District 19 seat being vacated by Republican Tom McClintock.

 

Dennert wrote that Jackson will make her announcement Wednesday at 11 a.m. at Mound Elementary School in Ventura.

 

The announcement comes right before Jim Dantona’s fundraiser, which is taking place Thursday.

 

The guest list, according once again to Dennert, who received an invitation to the event, includes former Maryland Lt. Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, and California Senate President Pro Tempore Don Perata.

 

It is clear that Democratic heavy-hitters are strongly behind Dantona in this race. Will Jackson’s entry into the race rain on Dantona’s parade?

 

It depends, I think, on how Jackson positions herself.

 

District 19 has a narrowing gap between Republicans and Democrats, 40.71% of people support the GOP, whereas 36.09% support Democrats. If Democrats can turn out the vote, especially if Republicans are as unmotivated as they seem now, the Democratic nominee has a good chance of winning the Senate seat.

 

But if Jackson is seen as too liberal in this conservative district, she will not win. Dantona seems to be the most moderate of the two. Neither Jackson nor Dantona have had much coverage in the press lately. This will likely change in the near future.

 

Dantona told the VC Reporter in a September 13 cover story that his main issues include jobs, education, and healthcare. He supports labor and opposes the war in Iraq.

 

This is all very sensible.

 

In the same article, Jackson outlined her primary issues: “I would be running on the basis of my past record, the issues I feel very deeply about, which include reforming our healthcare system, which is in desperate need of reform, protecting the environment, protecting public health, public education. I have a long track record of working with local law enforcement in issues of public safety.”

 

Also very sensible.

 

How is a Democrat to make up his or her mind? The answer, I suppose is that we wait and see. We get the candidates to spell out their positions more clearly. Maybe we’ll even get a debate.

 

Stranger things have happened.

 

Mound Elementary is located at 455 South Hill Road in Ventura. The school’s website does not list the event, and there is no indication as to whether it is open to the public, but if you would like to attend, you should call the school first. The school’s phone number is 805-289-1886.